you’re changing my arguments and refuting altered arguments instead of refuting the original points
that’s strawman
but like i said i don’t think i’m getting anywhere here
strawman
what you’re implying here is that i’m wolfreading you because you’re making reads and that’s oversimplification of my argument which shouldn’t really apply here
i voted you because your reads were made with a combination of:
- too early
- too much confidence
- too quick to jump to a conclusion about alignment and even a paired alignment read (braixen/evo v/w) in comparison to the depth of the read (the read isn’t elaborate enough / convincing enough to merit a strong read)
these three things together are what i find suspicious. individually they wouldn’t be enough but when they all go together that’s wolfy to me